Prerequisite: A journal that separates process from outcome
On a small screen, scroll the figure sideways or open it full size.
Read the figure
The proposed risk is four times the plan. Identify the rule deviation separately from whether the next trade wins.
Learning objective
Identify an emotional trigger and replace an impulsive order with a process check.
Fear of missing out can appear when price moves quickly, other traders display gains or a planned setup passes without entry. The feeling is information about your state, not evidence that a new position has positive expectancy. Name the trigger before evaluating the market scenario.
Revenge trading tries to repair the emotional impact of a loss through another trade, often with increased size or weaker rules. The market does not owe repayment. A new setup should be evaluated independently; prior losses change available equity, not the validity of the next signal.
A practical interruption can be brief: stop interacting with the order ticket, record the urge, check your written entry conditions and recalculate risk from current equity. Predetermine a pause rule in a practice plan. Pausing supports consistent behaviour but does not guarantee profitable subsequent decisions.
Worked example
In a hypothetical journal, a trader plans 50 units of risk but, after losing 50, feels an urge to risk 200 to recover quickly. The proposed next risk is four times the plan. Recognising this deviation is a process observation, regardless of whether the next trade would win.
Common mistakes
Do not use shame or a profitable impulsive trade as evidence that breaking the plan was sound. Separate outcome from decision quality.
Practice
Write an if-then rule for one personal trigger. In five replay sessions, count urges, pauses and rule deviations without grading yourself by profit.
Sources & further reading
Saved on this device. Export a backup before clearing browser data or changing device.
My learning pathEditorial review: 15 October 2026 · AI-assisted technical review; independent specialist review pending.
Translation available · editorial review pending